Suspected misconduct in public office by senior judges in the Gina Miller case
The purpose of this post is to make publicly available the text of three letters I have sent recently respectively to
The text of the three letters may be read here:
MIPO
It wouldn't surprise me if members of the public found it difficult to give house room to such serious allegations.
All I can say is that the letters are the result of many hours of analysis of the documents relating to the consideration of the Gina Miller case by the Divisional Court and by the United Kingdom Supreme Court.
If you spend the time studying the evidence you'll find it difficult to avoid the conclusion that something went spectacularly wrong in the Gina Miller case.
How could fourteen senior judges all make the same elementary error of Law?
The only conclusion that makes any sense to me is that fourteen senior judges deliberately decided to give a false judgement in the Gina Miller case.
If I'm right, that is demonstrable judicial misconduct on a scale which has never previously been identified.
Take time to read the letters. They are meant seriously and draw attention to a very worrying situation regarding the competence and/or integrity of the United Kingdom's senior judges.
The effect of the suspected misconduct is that Brexit was allowed to proceed when a more detailed and careful analysis of the facts and the Law would have led the judges to conclude that no lawful Brexit decision has been made.
If I'm right on that, and I think I am, then the last 15 months or so of political and legal turmoil about Brexit in the UK and across the European Union is based on a judicial lie.
- The Metropolitan Police Service
- Lady Hale, President of the United Kingdom Supreme Court
- jointly to the Justice Committee of the House of Commons and the Constitution Committee of the House of Lords
The text of the three letters may be read here:
MIPO
It wouldn't surprise me if members of the public found it difficult to give house room to such serious allegations.
All I can say is that the letters are the result of many hours of analysis of the documents relating to the consideration of the Gina Miller case by the Divisional Court and by the United Kingdom Supreme Court.
If you spend the time studying the evidence you'll find it difficult to avoid the conclusion that something went spectacularly wrong in the Gina Miller case.
How could fourteen senior judges all make the same elementary error of Law?
The only conclusion that makes any sense to me is that fourteen senior judges deliberately decided to give a false judgement in the Gina Miller case.
If I'm right, that is demonstrable judicial misconduct on a scale which has never previously been identified.
Take time to read the letters. They are meant seriously and draw attention to a very worrying situation regarding the competence and/or integrity of the United Kingdom's senior judges.
The effect of the suspected misconduct is that Brexit was allowed to proceed when a more detailed and careful analysis of the facts and the Law would have led the judges to conclude that no lawful Brexit decision has been made.
If I'm right on that, and I think I am, then the last 15 months or so of political and legal turmoil about Brexit in the UK and across the European Union is based on a judicial lie.
Comments
Post a Comment